Connect with us

Headlines

Lab-Grown Diamond Bore Fraudulent Inscription, GIA Reports

mm

Published

on

The organization says it was ‘blatant fraud.’

INSTORE GIAinscription

The GIA reports that this 1.76-carat synthetic diamond was submitted with a fake GIA inscription (partially redacted for privacy) of an actual GIA report number for a natural diamond. Photos by Troy Ardon.

The Gemological Institute of America reports that a diamond it examined bore the inscription of a natural diamond when it was, in fact, lab-grown.

“Rarely do we encounter the type of blatant fraud described here,” the GIA’s Christopher M. Breeding and Troy Ardon wrote in an article posted on the organization’s website.

The stone, a round brilliant cut, was submitted for an updated diamond grading report. The organization’s Carlsbad laboratory found that its girdle was inscribed with a GIA report number issued in 2015. 

The older report represented a natural, untreated diamond, according to the article. But the lab found that the specifics of the diamond they were looking didn’t match that report.

Advertisement

And further testing showed that it was, in fact, a diamond grown in a laboratory by the high-pressure/high-temperature, or HPHT, method.

“Aside from the observed discrepancies in weight (1.74 vs. 1.76 ct), color (D vs. F), and clarity (VVS1 vs. VS1), FTIR spectra clearly showed that these were not the same diamond,” Breeding and Ardon wrote.

And there was another red flag: The inscription on the diamond wasn’t in the font GIA uses, according to the article.

“It is important for the industry and public to exercise caution, because these types of misleading practices do occur,” the authors wrote. “We believe the submitting client noticed inconsistencies with the GIA report information and sent it to the lab for an updated report.”

Read more at GIA

Advertisement

Advertisement

SPONSORED VIDEO

Wilkerson Testimonials

If It’s Time to Consolidate, It’s Time to Call Wilkerson

When Tom Moses decided to close one of the two Moses Jewelers stores in western Pennsylvania, it was time to call in the experts. After reviewing two candidates, Moses, a co-owner of the 72 year-old business, decided to go with Wilkerson. The sale went better than expected. Concerned about running it during the pandemic, Moses says it might have helped the sale. “People wanted to get out, so there was pent-up demand,” he says. “Folks were not traveling so there was disposable income, and we don’t recall a single client commenting to us, feeling uncomfortable. It was busy in here!” And perhaps most importantly, Wilkerson was easy to deal with, he says, and Susan, their personal Wilkerson consultant, was knowledgeable, organized and “really good.” Now, the company can focus on their remaining location — without the hassle of carrying over merchandise that either wouldn’t fit or hadn’t sold. “The decision to hire Wilkerson was a good one,” says Moses.

Promoted Headlines

Most Popular