INSTORE’S Latest Real Deal Scenario

The Case of the Thorny Promotion

A client returns a piece of jewelry bought during a promotion, only to find that they’re not entitled to a full refund.

Excited to indulge in some Mother’s Day shopping, Kimberly Johnson waved goodbye to her husband and children, grateful for the chance to browse freely and enjoy a beautiful day. As she strolled along the bustling sidewalk, a promotional sign outside Luxe Diamonds caught her attention. They had just launched a special promotion: Spend $499 on any qualifying diamond jewelry and receive a dozen roses free, a gesture to help customers celebrate their mothers with a little something extra.

Kimberly stepped into Luxe Diamonds eager to learn more about the offer details. She was hoping to purchase a diamond pendant for her mother, but she was on a tight budget. The potential of receiving a free bouquet of roses was attractive because it would give her something extra to gift her sister while staying within her budget.

BY:
MEGAN CRABTREE

As she admired the array of diamonds, Kimberly was greeted by Thomas, a knowledgeable salesperson at Luxe Diamonds. He shared the details of the Mother’s Day promotion and guided Kimberly to the jewelry display showcasing qualifying pieces.

Kimberly noticed a 0.25 TCW halo pendant with a unique vintage look and immediately knew it was the perfect gift for her mother. With a smile, she completed her purchase, meeting the $499 threshold, and happily accepted the complimentary dozen roses, a vibrant yellow bouquet destined to brighten her sister’s day.

Mother’s Day arrived, and Kimberly’s thoughtful gifts brought joy to her family. Her mother was delighted by the diamond pendant, while her sister was pleasantly surprised by the roses. Kimberly was grateful for the chance to express her love and appreciation.

However, a few days later, Kimberly returned to Luxe Diamonds with a heavy heart. She explained to Thomas that her mother had unexpectedly received a similar pendant as a gift from her brother, a heartfelt gesture from overseas where he was serving in the military. She did not want to diminish her brother’s efforts, so she reluctantly requested to return the diamond pendant she had purchased.

Thomas, understanding Kimberly’s predicament, offered to process the return but explained that the value on the roses was $30, and when you return an item, you have to pay the value of the gift you received with the purchase.

Kimberly’s heart sank as she realized the implications of the store’s policy. She had already gifted the roses to her sister so could no longer return them. Thomas, empathetic yet bound by the rules, could only offer a partial refund minus the cost of the roses, leaving Kimberly with a sense of disappointment.

Turning to the Mother’s Day promotion coupon in her hand, Kimberly scrutinized the fine print, searching for clarity on the value of the roses. However, the coupon offered no specific details regarding the worth of the complimentary item, leaving Kimberly feeling as though the partial refund was unfair and misleading. What had started as a gesture of love and celebration had now left her grappling with frustration.

QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER

How should Luxe Diamonds have communicated the value of the complimentary roses more clearly in the Mother’s Day promotion to avoid confusion and disappointment?

In this scenario, do you believe the policy regarding the return of complimentary items is fair to the customer?

Reflecting on the importance of transparent communication in promotional offers, what steps can retailers take to ensure that all terms and conditions associated with promotions are communicated to customers, both in-store and through promotional materials?


Fill out my online form.

This website uses cookies.