Connect with us

Press Releases

Fenix Diamonds Prevails Over Carnegie and Washington Diamonds In Patent Litigation

The case was extensively covered by the business and trade media in recent months.

mm

Published

on

Fenix Diamonds Prevails Over Carnegie and Washington Diamonds In Patent Litigation

(PRESS RELEASE) NEW YORK — Fenix Diamonds, an international supplier of high-end type IIa lab-grown diamonds, prevailed in a federal lawsuit filed by the Carnegie Institution of Washington and Washington Diamonds (also known as “WD Lab Grown Diamonds” or “M7D Corporation”). Fenix is headquartered in New York City. The case was extensively covered by the business and trade media in recent months.

In their lawsuit, Carnegie and Washington Diamonds alleged that the high-quality of Fenix’s lab-grown diamonds indicates that they are made through processes that infringe patents held by the Plaintiffs. Since the lawsuit began in January 2020, Fenix has maintained that Carnegie’s and Washington Diamonds’ theories lacked any scientific basis.

On June 16, 2021, a Federal Court announced that Fenix’s lab-grown diamonds and the processes used to make them do not infringe the patents. The Court entered judgment for Fenix and dismissed all of Carnegie’s and Washington Diamonds’ claims with prejudice. Only Fenix’s counterclaims against the Plaintiffs will proceed to trial. The Court’s opinion was delivered by United States District Judge Jed S. Rakoff for the Southern District of New York.

Fenix offered the following comment in response to the Court’s decision:

“Fenix supplies diamonds with integrity. Our diamonds are meticulously grown for weeks to attain the particular combination of size, color, and clarity that customers expect from the Fenix brand.

Fenix’s success in the lawsuit reflects our devotion to the market, to our products, and especially, to our customers. Their support over the past eighteen months has been incredible. The best is yet to come.”

Advertisement

Fenix was represented by the Chicago office of Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd. and the New York City office of Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP. The patents asserted against Fenix were U.S. Patent Nos. 6,858,078 and RE41,189. The Court’s decision is publicly available.

Advertisement

SPONSORED VIDEO

This Third-Generation Jeweler Was Ready for Retirement. He Called Wilkerson

Retirement is never easy, especially when it means the end to a business that was founded in 1884. But for Laura and Sam Sipe, it was time to put their own needs first. They decided to close J.C. Sipe Jewelers, one of Indianapolis’ most trusted names in fine jewelry, and call Wilkerson. “Laura and I decided the conditions were right,” says Sam. Wilkerson handled every detail in their going-out-of-business sale, from marketing to manning the sales floor. “The main goal was to sell our existing inventory that’s all paid for and turn that into cash for our retirement,” says Sam. “It’s been very, very productive.” Would they recommend Wilkerson to other jewelers who want to enjoy their golden years? Absolutely! “Call Wilkerson,” says Laura. “They can help you achieve your goals so you’ll be able to move into retirement comfortably.”

Promoted Headlines

Most Popular